> Braŭno
La nomo "Braŭno" ne estas objekto de "konas", sed priskribo de "sinjoron".
Plej facile kompreneblas tio, se ni interpretas la frazon tiel:
Ĉu vi konas (la/tiun) sinjoron, kies nomo estas Braŭno?
PMEG rimarkas pri tio:
"Post o-vorto povas aperi rekta priskribo, kiu identigas la aferon.
Normale temas pri la propra nomo de la afero.
Tia identiga priskribo ne havu n-finaĵon [...]"
Fonto: http://bertilow.com/pmeg/gramat...razpartoj.html (legu sub "Identigaj priskriboj")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# This comment was copied from #1733065 when duplicate sentences were merged.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dankon.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# This comment was copied from #1733065 when duplicate sentences were merged.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Duplicates of this sentence have been deleted:
x #1733065
Tags
View all tagsLists
Sentence text
License: CC BY 2.0 FRLogs
This sentence was initially added as a translation of sentence #1107758
added by soweli_Elepanto, July 28, 2012
linked by soweli_Elepanto, July 28, 2012
edited by soweli_Elepanto, July 28, 2012
linked by PaulP, May 8, 2016
linked by PaulP, May 8, 2016
linked by PaulP, May 8, 2016
linked by Horus, May 22, 2016