Sentence nº306934
Important! You are about to add a translation to the sentence above. If you do not understand this sentence, click on "Cancel" to display everything again, and then click on the sentence that you understand and want to translate from.
Please do not forget capital letters and punctuation! Thank you.
Comments
Add a comment
You need to be logged in to add a comment. If you are not registered, you can register here.
Sacredceltic: I think the term tautology could confuse people... but we need a tag for it. Any other suggestions?
That is how it is named http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tautology
And it is also the same in German or French...
I'm not saying they're dangerous, but for a learner, they're not obvious.
For instance, I just read "beneficial for good health http://tatoeba.org/fre/sentences/show/20214, and if you are, say, Chinese, it is not straightforward that the latin root "bene-" and "good" indicate the same thing, so that if it is "beneficial", it can't be for "bad health"...
So I suggest it is at least as useful to emphasise tautologies as it is to indicate the number of words of a sentence.
That's why a tag could be confusing. Moreover, how many people learning English will actually know what "tautology" means? I didn't know this word until last year, and I started speaking English when I was 8...
> And it is also the same in German or French...
Yes, I know this term, but I learned its logic meaning before the other ones, and that meaning is quite far from "redundancy". Anyway, I don't doubt it describes well what you explain - that's simply its name. So, at the end, "Tautology" tag on or off?
a. Needless repetition of the same sense in different words; redundancy.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/tautology
2. (Logic) An empty or vacuous statement composed of simpler statements in a fashion that makes it logically true whether the simpler statements are factually true or false; for example, the statement Either it will rain tomorrow or it will not rain tomorrow.
Well, if you're anglophone...Yes of course! Tags are already in English, now English will also pervade the meaning of tags...as it has already!
I suggested "tautology" because it's a shared latin root for many european languages...
interesting
By the way I don't think the point of Sacredceltic is "it's bad" or "it's not correct sentence" or "People don't say that". So even if was used million of time will not change that in a semantic point of view, there's, according to Sacredceltic, a tautology
In French for example we do have a single verb 'monter" to say (more or less) "go upstair" but still a lot of people do say "monter en haut" "monter upstair" so which is useless as the verb "monter" already bring the meaning of "upstair", though this sentence is grammaticaly valid and that it's widely spread, it's still a redundant.
according to me and thousands of linguists.
Once again, the "proof by Google" is irrelevant. More and more people speak a broken English, and of course, search engines mirror this.
I already stated this in the past on Tatoeba : currently, even a few gross spelling mistakes in French, outnumber their correct spellings on Google...Google doesn't rule spellings, grammar, or tautologies...
In French, there is an academy of writers who define the language.
On Tatoeba, in English, the academy is restricted to one single person : CK and his judgement and subsequent "OK" tags are always FINAL.
Welcome to a better world.
But eventually, you're the one to decide if a sentence is "OK" or not...
> More and more people speak a broken English, and of course, search engines mirror this.
Mostly because you define "correct English" as old English. While certain types of mistakes (such as spelling) are clearly errors, grammar, usage, and logic change over time.
According to what/whose criteria?
>Mostly because you define "correct English" as old English.
Says who? No, I don't define Englsih AT ALL. Only you do, with your "OK" tags, actually...
>While certain types of mistakes (such as spelling) are clearly error
According to whom?
What difference is there in English by your definition between a "clear" error and an unclear one?