I second that.

no you didn't. i assumed prefacing it with *debate!!* signified not being serious.

learning is useful, but my motivation is perhaps more selfish: with harakat my transliteration script is better. i'm not cool enough to have it run through tashkeel first, though that would be badass.

yeah i know. im just messing with you.

If we're worrying about orthography then saeb needs to include harakat :)

I knew a guy named Jesús. He WAS kinda a jerk, but this is hardly the forum to air those grievances.

And all the successful terrorist leaders are eloquent. Otherwise no one would listen.

you're so banned.

Things are already political in a way. For example: It's illegal in China (where I live) to show the blue Uуɡhuɾ flag used on the site based on it representing a ѕераɾаtіѕt movement. I completely agree that it's the best choice to use it to represent the language, but any time I'm looking at sentences here I'm technically breaking some law here. So if/when they add Τіbеtаn (please add Τіbеtаn), same thing. Use the Τіbеtаn flag? I think they should, but it's still potentially a politically charged decision.

Good to know. And actually it's still pretty much entirely my fault. I searched at the top but then I think I stopped paying attention so when it sent me to the page saying "Nope, but you can add a sentence:", I thought I was searching again. It's not the form's issue. It's my attention span's issue.

Right. So. I'm not 13 years old. It was an honest mistake. Here's the problem:

I was wondering if Tatoeba had any sort of resistance to profanity. I thought something like "damnit" would be a common enough thing. So I MEANT to SEARCH for "damn". Turns out I added it as a sentence instead. Same for "fuck" because it took me two tries to realise I was using the wrong text box.

So those can be deleted outright. I didn't see any way to do it so I abandoned the sentences instead in case there is such a way and someone else wants to adopt them to get them deleted. 380292 and 380290.

Apologies.