Is it wise to add two Sanskrit sentences, one is Devanagari and one in a transliteration? I think, this one should rather be in a comment to the Devanagari one.

(yes, I know that Devanagari weren't the only script used for Sanskrit; but this here is merely a scientific transliteration)

flag?

What do you suggest, dafp?

You think it's a transliteration?
I don't know what language is it.
It's better to put this sentence on the Unknow category at least, no?

Yes, it's the transliteration of the Sanskrit sentence linked to it. Sanskrit was and is written in many different scripts, but this is only the "scientific" (Sanskritologists') transliteration. I don't really know what should be decided for Sanskrit. I'd prefer this sentence to be a comment to the other Sanskrit sentence (in Devanagari script).

Actually I suggest this sentence to be deleted and its "translations" to be merged with the Sanskrit sentence below, written in Devanagari. This is an artificial transliteration, not any alphabet that Sanskrit is traditionally written in.

Any objections?

I agree with Vortarulo that this indolocal transliteration should be deleted. I have appended it as a comment to the Sanskrit Devanagari version

Thanks, Objectivesea!
I'll delete this sentence then. The optimum would be if Tatoeba could automatically create a working transcription for every Sanskrit sentence. But that's perhaps a little difficult now.