menu
تاتیبہ
language
رجسٹر لاگ ان
language سرائیکی
menu
تاتیبہ

chevron_right رجسٹر

chevron_right لاگ ان

براؤز

chevron_right رینڈم جملے ݙکھاؤ

chevron_right زبان نال براؤز کرو

chevron_right تندیر نال براؤز کرو

chevron_right ٹیگ نال براؤز کرو

chevron_right آڈیو براؤز کرو

برادری

chevron_right وال

chevron_right سارے ممبراں دی تندیر

chevron_right ممبراں دیاں زباناں

chevron_right مقامی ٻولݨ آ لے

search
clear
swap_horiz
search
JimBreen JimBreen March 21, 2010 March 21, 2010 at 6:11:23 AM UTC flag Report link پرمالنک

Traditional and Simplified Chinese

I saw the comment about converting hanzi on-the-fly. Be very cautious about that, as there are many cases where it simply doesn't work. Proper Traditional<->Simplified conversion needs to work at the lexeme level and in some cases needs some context for disambiguation.

Jack Halpern wrote a very good paper about this about 10 years ago:
http://www.cjk.org/cjk/c2c/c2cbasis.htm

PS: how do I make a comment on another posting?

{{vm.hiddenReplies[377] ? 'expand_more' : 'expand_less'}} جواب لکاؤ جواب ݙکھاؤ
JimBreen JimBreen March 21, 2010 March 21, 2010 at 6:40:28 AM UTC flag Report link پرمالنک

OK, I worked out how to do a follow-on. I'd clicked "reply" but it hadn't worked. Now it does.

sysko sysko March 21, 2010 March 21, 2010 at 11:10:11 AM UTC flag Report link پرمالنک

the traditional to simplified chinese is not made at "character by character" level, but try to decompose the sentence (you can see how the sentence has been segmented by looking to pinyin)
As I've said I'm in conctact with the guy who develop it, so don't hesitate to report any bad segmentations, I will report to him