menu
Tatoeba
language
Register Log in
language English
menu
Tatoeba

chevron_right Register

chevron_right Log in

Browse

chevron_right Show random sentence

chevron_right Browse by language

chevron_right Browse by list

chevron_right Browse by tag

chevron_right Browse audio

Community

chevron_right Wall

chevron_right List of all members

chevron_right Languages of members

chevron_right Native speakers

search
clear
swap_horiz
search

Sentence #328454

info_outline Metadata
warning
Your sentence was not added because the following already exists.
Sentence #{{vm.sentence.id}} — belongs to {{vm.sentence.user.username}} Sentence #{{vm.sentence.id}}
{{vm.sentence.furigana.info_message}} {{vm.sentence.text}}
star This sentence belongs to a native speaker.
warning This sentence is not reliable.
content_copy Copy sentence info Go to sentence page
subdirectory_arrow_right
warning
{{transcription.info_message}}
Translations
Unlink this translation link Make into direct translation chevron_right
{{translation.furigana.info_message}} {{translation.text}} Existing sentence #{{::translation.id}} has been added as a translation.
edit Edit this translation
warning This sentence is not reliable.
content_copy Copy sentence info Go to sentence page
subdirectory_arrow_right
warning
{{transcription.info_message}}
Translations of translations
Unlink this translation link Make into direct translation chevron_right
{{translation.furigana.info_message}} {{translation.text}} Existing sentence #{{::translation.id}} has been added as a translation.
edit Edit this translation
warning This sentence is not reliable.
content_copy Copy sentence info Go to sentence page
subdirectory_arrow_right
warning
{{transcription.info_message}}
{{vm.expandableIcon}} {{vm.sentence.expandLabel}} Fewer translations

Comments

JimBreen JimBreen April 29, 2010 April 29, 2010 at 8:55:57 AM UTC link Permalink

A respondent suggests "screwing" might match the, er, register of the Japanese a bit better.

fcbond fcbond May 1, 2010 May 1, 2010 at 3:40:00 PM UTC link Permalink

I think it is fine as it is.

jakov jakov November 29, 2010 November 29, 2010 at 2:54:12 PM UTC link Permalink

please take away the " [XXX]", it's already tagged as such

blay_paul blay_paul November 30, 2010 November 30, 2010 at 10:01:22 PM UTC link Permalink

Please don't. We're keeping the [XXX] notation in sentences, as well as as tags, until a filtering system is in place here (and hopefully in WWWJDIC).

BraveSentry BraveSentry March 14, 2011 March 14, 2011 at 10:25:01 AM UTC link Permalink

humn...there´s no such notation in any of the translations, nor is it in any other sentence that should have it...at least of those i stumbled upon. also there is no recommendation to add this notation if contributing any sentence with sexual content.

i suggest to remove it, because of the above reasons.

Swift Swift March 14, 2011 March 14, 2011 at 1:02:12 PM UTC link Permalink

I sent blay_paul a message in January, asking about the [XXX] annotation but received no answer. I imagine one could use this to filter out sentences with that annotation.

There are, however, currently only 28 sentences with this annotation but around 60 that are tagged with the XXX tag and more that have neither.

Thus there is no use for it unless it's added to all possible sentences. With the ambiguity and foreseeable disagreement of which sentences it should be applied to, we should keep it simple and remove this annotation, just as we would any other.

TRANG TRANG March 15, 2011 March 15, 2011 at 1:32:16 PM UTC link Permalink

The [XXX] is here because WWWJDIC needs it. But I'll ask Jim Breen if they can be removed now.

JimBreen JimBreen March 15, 2011 March 15, 2011 at 10:52:08 PM UTC link Permalink

WWWJDIC doesn't use the [XXX] at all. As Paul said in an earlier comment "We're keeping the [XXX] notation in sentences, as well as as tags, until a filtering system is in place here (and hopefully in WWWJDIC)."

I suspect Paul was planning some sort of filter for rude language.

Swift Swift March 15, 2011 March 15, 2011 at 11:31:20 PM UTC link Permalink

Except we're not...

Neither in policy nor practice (see my earlier comment).

fcbond fcbond March 16, 2011 March 16, 2011 at 2:03:11 AM UTC link Permalink

Can I get a policy ruling from Trang? It appears the Jim doesn't need this, and filtering can perhaps better be done on tags, so my personal opinion is that we should delete the [XXX]. There only appear to be ten or so, and they are mainly tagged already.

BTW: it would be nice if the tags were displayed in the search results as well, currently you have to click on a sentence to see the tags.

TRANG TRANG March 16, 2011 March 16, 2011 at 8:26:45 AM UTC link Permalink

Okay so we can remove the [XXX].

By the way, for those who would be interested, tags are exported here every Saturday:
http://tatoeba.org/files/downloads/tags.csv

It's not yet mentioned on the downloads page though.

fcbond fcbond March 16, 2011 March 16, 2011 at 10:43:27 AM UTC link Permalink

XXX removed, 'til fixed.

Metadata

close

Sentence text

License: CC BY 2.0 FR

Logs

We cannot determine yet whether this sentence was initially derived from translation or not.

Even if we don't get lucky on the first try we can just keep fucking till I get pregnant. [XXX]

added by blay_paul, December 7, 2007

Even if we don't get lucky on the first try we can just keep fucking till I get pregnant.

edited by TRANG, June 13, 2010

Even if we don't get lucky on the first try we can just keep fucking till I get pregnant. [XXX]

edited by blay_paul, June 13, 2010

Even if we don't get lucky on the first try we can just keep fucking till I get pregnant.

edited by fcbond, March 16, 2011

Even if we don't get lucky on the first try we can just keep fucking 'til I get pregnant.

edited by fcbond, March 16, 2011

Even if we don't get lucky on the first try we can just keep fucking till I get pregnant.

edited by Nero, April 13, 2012