Translation is one of Tatoeba's core missions. Unless I'm misunderstanding what you mean by "outsourcing", I don't understand why we would want to outsource it. If people want to join our effort, they should join our community. Similarly, an attempt to make it easier from a technical point of view to participate in Tatoeba tasks should start by determining what can be done inside Tatoeba.

> these sentences are being collected to generate a Kabyle voice assistant model for an open-source GPS

I see. This can be an excuse for every language, but once a place's name is recorded, I guess the same audio can be used with many different patterns. That's how it is even in some subway announcements. Using each name with every pattern and recording audio for each name hundred of times don't seem to me the most efficient way to achieve that. Also, one would expect to see the major cities in a GPS program, but that pool doesn't even include the capital. Place names aren't the only source of near-duplicates anyway. My recommendation is that the rankings on the stats page should be based on translated sentence counts and not on the total numbers of sentences. The latter can still be placed in parentheses next to the former without affecting the rankings. It may have some drawbacks and seem a bit childish, but I believe that simple change will help improving the quality of the corpus by discouraging users from mass-producing sentences with same patterns just to boost their language to the top of the rankings. If they are really doing it for some other projects like GPS, NLP, space program or whatever, then that change shouldn't affect their motivation.

> So there is a specific purpose for them.

There is a specific purpose for everything. If there is a specific purpose, is it okay to transform Tatoeba into yet another soulless infinitely-declined compilation of sentences for machine learning? I can't see how tagging would help people avoid such sentences, except if there is a tag "robot-generated boring stuff for NLP - please ignore".
I've argued before, and others too, that the source of data shouldn't be altered by the tool that uses it, especially if there are several tools, if people want the source of data to stay collaborative and fruitful. It seems that the battle is lost, so be it. But, then we cannot be surprised if we see more and more users collaborating uninteresting sentences/translations or untranslated sentences. Maybe we should remove the "human-made" in the presentation of Tatoeba.
Some people whined about NLP. They are professionals, bla bla bla. That's horsecrap. I've done NLP. I see some of my colleagues do NLP weekly. None of them has ever polluted a corpus that people spent time to build to fit their NLP tool. (To be completely honest, most of these corpus aren't being open to public contributions help :P )

Then again, if the battle is lost, it's fine. I won't argue about variety, declinations in other languages, and all other smoke-screen arguments. The reality is that selfish people aren't good contributors, period. If I want declinations, I open a book about declinations, take the afternoon to code the logic and press the "Run" button. Save time and community peace.

If I start teaching French to 3-years old, I'll made my own private corpus of "Je suis *" in Tatoeba

"I'm wodering you just created your account today, with no contribution yet and you are able to analyze stats. It's amazing!!!"
Is it bothering you? Then, you may understand that something is not in the normal.

Why Tatoeba? You are a computer engineer. Create a platform!
Or just do not write this much near-duplicates here. It is for language learners, not GPS-s, NLP-s. It is for PEOPLE from PEOPLE, NOT for COMPUTERS from COMPUTERS!

Sometimes I'm not heard:
https://tatoeba.org/eng/wall/sh...#message_36115
But in Hungarian, I do not stop when things get harsh.

Remélem, ami történt, nem történik meg újra. ;)

As an introduction, let me state that I disagree with your vision of how to contribute on Tatoeba (any corpus, not restricted to the kab), although I agree with your vision about your language. That being said, I would like to ask you one question:
If the member of your team are identified kabyle speakers, what about your translators? Are they identified **competent** writers?

I want to insist that is not a provocation but a real concern. We've already seen kabyle contributors contributing many bad translations of their own sentences into French or Spanish. That is very worrying for proofreaders and maintainers of these corpora as it introduced an unnecessary big load of work. I would like to remind that the policy of Tatoeba is to translate only what you can really translate, not what you think you can translate.

+1

@Cabo this profile is not a bot
https://tatoeba.org/eng/user/pr...Yazid_Bouhamam

The contributors on the kab corpora are identified. We are a team working together on diffrent types of kab sentences. We are creating and sharing content before putting them on Tatoeba. Along with Tatoeba, we are also working on diffrent open projects.