menu
Tatoeba
language
Register Log in
language English
menu
Tatoeba

chevron_right Register

chevron_right Log in

Browse

chevron_right Show random sentence

chevron_right Browse by language

chevron_right Browse by list

chevron_right Browse by tag

chevron_right Browse audio

Community

chevron_right Wall

chevron_right List of all members

chevron_right Languages of members

chevron_right Native speakers

search
clear
swap_horiz
search
minshirui {{ icon }} keyboard_arrow_right

Profile

keyboard_arrow_right

Sentences

keyboard_arrow_right

Vocabulary

keyboard_arrow_right

Reviews

keyboard_arrow_right

Lists

keyboard_arrow_right

Favorites

keyboard_arrow_right

Comments

keyboard_arrow_right

Comments on minshirui's sentences

keyboard_arrow_right

Wall messages

keyboard_arrow_right

Logs

keyboard_arrow_right

Audio

keyboard_arrow_right

Transcriptions

translate

Translate minshirui's sentences

minshirui's messages on the Wall (total 37)

minshirui minshirui June 3, 2011 June 3, 2011 at 3:31:00 AM UTC link Permalink

Sorry if this has already been discussed in the past (if so, please point me to the discussion).

I have noticed that often a translation in one language will need to be changed to sound natural, and every time I do this, I worry about whether the corrected sentence will still be an accurate translation for the directly linked sentences. Since I often do not know the languages for all the other linked sentences, one method is to manually go through each linked sentence and post a comment reminding the author to update the translation. However, this is cumbersome when there are more than one or two direct links.

Is there perhaps a way to automatically notify the owner of a sentence that a sentence that is directly linked against theirs has changed?

minshirui minshirui January 8, 2011 January 8, 2011 at 4:03:41 AM UTC link Permalink

Just FYI, every traditional character does not correspond to one unique simplified character. Cases in point:
著 (zhe) -> 着
著 (zhù) -> 著

minshirui minshirui January 5, 2011 January 5, 2011 at 11:13:48 PM UTC link Permalink

Hmm... I don't see that on this sentence: http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/692904

minshirui minshirui January 5, 2011 January 5, 2011 at 5:49:23 PM UTC link Permalink

Is there any sort of tagging added to the two sentences to say that one is simplified and the other traditional? I see this as being very useful if people want to use tatoeba as part of other applications.

minshirui minshirui December 20, 2010 December 20, 2010 at 11:17:45 PM UTC link Permalink

Where should one report bugs in the Cantonese romanization? For example, in this sentence (http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/676270), the characters are:
我次次聽呢首歌都會聽到喊。

Currently, this is generated:
ngo⁵ ci³ ci³ ting³ ne¹ sau² go¹ dou¹ wui⁶ ting³ dou³ ham⁶ .

However, some of the words are incorrectly romanized. It should be:
ngo⁵ ci³ ci³ ting¹ ni¹ sau² go¹ dou¹ wui⁶ ting¹ dou³ haam³.

minshirui minshirui October 31, 2010 October 31, 2010 at 8:18:26 PM UTC link Permalink

I don't think either of us are going to get anywhere in trying to guess what the majority of people want. I suggest playing it by ear. If many Tatoeba users write to Tatoeba complaining about the flag of India being used as a symbol for Hindi, we should consider a change then based on some sort of poll.

minshirui minshirui October 31, 2010 October 31, 2010 at 9:06:42 AM UTC link Permalink

+1

minshirui minshirui October 30, 2010 October 30, 2010 at 8:46:53 AM UTC link Permalink

I personally feel that the British flag is fine for English, as is the Indian flag for Hindi. They might not be a 101% politically correct, but they are intuitive, aesthetically pleasing and what most people would expect. I don't think it is an insult to, say, Bengali that Hindi gets the Indian flag, because it is India's national language (though not the "official" language) and has the greatest number of native speakers. The same goes for China and Mandarin. Cantonese, which has its home in Hong Kong has the flag of Hong Kong which I think is most appropriate. Again, I think the idea should be to pick a flag or symbol that is representative and makes it immediately obvious to anyone which language is under discussion. The current system achieves this, and I would not like it to be substituted for some three-letter language codes, which would just look bad.

minshirui minshirui October 23, 2010 October 23, 2010 at 2:31:02 PM UTC link Permalink

I'm sorry to bring this up if it has already been discussed before, but why do we have tags like "less than 8 words"? Isn't that something that could be calculated on the fly if needed?

minshirui minshirui September 17, 2010 September 17, 2010 at 6:21:36 PM UTC link Permalink

Yes =)

Shanghainese arguably has an easier task though, since it has an 80-90% correspondence with Mandarin.

minshirui minshirui September 17, 2010 September 17, 2010 at 6:19:47 PM UTC link Permalink

You're welcome! And thank you!

minshirui minshirui September 17, 2010 September 17, 2010 at 10:40:38 AM UTC link Permalink

Thank you, all! (even CK, for the Japanese omedetou, which you deleted for some reason...) =)

minshirui minshirui September 17, 2010 September 17, 2010 at 8:13:39 AM UTC link Permalink

हिन्दी में ३००० वाक्य!

minshirui minshirui September 17, 2010 September 17, 2010 at 5:59:44 AM UTC link Permalink

+1

minshirui minshirui September 12, 2010 September 12, 2010 at 11:32:21 PM UTC link Permalink

Less than 200? I'm sure you could do them single-handed, Paul. =P

minshirui minshirui September 12, 2010 September 12, 2010 at 11:31:29 PM UTC link Permalink

5

minshirui minshirui September 6, 2010 September 6, 2010 at 11:18:29 PM UTC link Permalink

哈哈,为什么不直接用『上海』或者『沪语』?不够有趣么?

minshirui minshirui September 6, 2010 September 6, 2010 at 9:37:48 AM UTC link Permalink

据维基百科,上海话的『模子』是『汉子』的意思。

http://zh.wikipedia.org/zh/上海话

minshirui minshirui September 6, 2010 September 6, 2010 at 9:34:23 AM UTC link Permalink

上海话的图标为什么是『模子』?

minshirui minshirui September 4, 2010 September 4, 2010 at 11:03:33 PM UTC link Permalink

Yeah, that's what I'm using right now, and as you mentioned, it's not ideal.