menu
تاتیبہ
language
رجسٹر لاگ ان
language سرائیکی
menu
تاتیبہ

chevron_right رجسٹر

chevron_right لاگ ان

براؤز

chevron_right رینڈم جملے ݙکھاؤ

chevron_right زبان نال براؤز کرو

chevron_right تندیر نال براؤز کرو

chevron_right ٹیگ نال براؤز کرو

chevron_right آڈیو براؤز کرو

برادری

chevron_right وال

chevron_right سارے ممبراں دی تندیر

chevron_right ممبراں دیاں زباناں

chevron_right مقامی ٻولݨ آ لے

search
clear
swap_horiz
search
Alba {{ icon }} keyboard_arrow_right

پروفائل

keyboard_arrow_right

جملے

keyboard_arrow_right

ژخیرہ الفاظ

keyboard_arrow_right

ریویو

keyboard_arrow_right

تندیراں

keyboard_arrow_right

پسنداں

keyboard_arrow_right

تبصرے

keyboard_arrow_right

Alba دے جملیاں تے تبصرے

keyboard_arrow_right

وال سنیہے

keyboard_arrow_right

لوگو

keyboard_arrow_right

آڈیو

keyboard_arrow_right

نقلاں

translate

Alba دے جملیاں دا ترجمہ کرو

وال (کل 7) تے Albaدا سنیہا

Alba Alba July 4, 2012 July 4, 2012 at 12:08:39 PM UTC link پرمالنک

I would like to make a suggestion about the Japanese sentences in the corpus. I find sentences with automatically added furigana not very convenient. Most of them are not correct so, since they don’t fulfill their function, they become useless. Some people usually post comments with the right reading, but wouldn’t it be better that users themselves could modify that furigana sentences?

The fact of not being able to find words just by writing the hiragana is also a problem. Sometimes a Japanese word may be written with several different kanjis, and the only sentences displayed are those containing the same kanji that you wrote.

From my point of view, a good and easy solution would be having furigana sentences deleted and letting users write a related sentence wholly in hiragana, as it was a translation. This way it would become possible to search by pronunciation and not just by kanji. What do you think?

Alba Alba June 14, 2012 June 14, 2012 at 1:37:44 PM UTC link پرمالنک

Thanks. :)

Alba Alba June 13, 2012 June 13, 2012 at 6:11:18 PM UTC link پرمالنک

Thank you very much, freefighter and sysko. I've just installed it; I will try it out as soon as I'm free.

You can find here the out-of-date link from which I tried to download the program: http://tatoeba.org/spa/faq#submit-audio
It should be replaced with the correct one.

Alba Alba June 13, 2012 June 13, 2012 at 6:03:25 PM UTC link پرمالنک

Exacto, la clave está en las palabras "cuando designan entidades o colectividades institucionales".

Alba Alba June 13, 2012 June 13, 2012 at 5:55:49 PM UTC link پرمالنک

Teskmon, puedes estar tranquilo, la Fundéu es totalmente fiable. En la práctica es el intérprete de la RAE, siempre se encarga de aclarar las ambigüedades de esta última. ¬¬ Si te fijas, en la parte superior derecha de la página pone "Con el asesoramiento de la Real Academia Española".

Alba Alba June 13, 2012 June 13, 2012 at 5:39:40 PM UTC link پرمالنک

Cuidado, chicos, las explicaciones de la RAE no suelen ser muy claras. Sólo se debe escribir con mayúscula cuando se trate de la institución. "La policía", si hace referencia a un grupo de policías, también va en minúscula.

Podéis consultarlo en estas páginas, viene mejor explicado:

-> http://www.fundeu.es/recomendac...cula-1050.html

->(apartado 3.14.) http://www.ops.org.bo/multimedi...%BAscula...pdf

->(apartado 29) http://reglasdeortografia.com/mayusculas.html

Alba Alba June 13, 2012 June 13, 2012 at 9:04:07 AM UTC link پرمالنک

Hello, everybody. I am thinking about contributing audio, so I've tried to download Shtooka Recorder, but the link seems to be broken. Do you know if there is another way to record sentences?