Menu

About tags...
I was wondering if tags which refer to almost the same aspect of sentences are meant to be combined into one tag. If so; who is responsible for that?
There seem to be many equivalent pairs, for instance: job and profession. I believe they should be merged. Is this a right approach for such situations?

Similar tags have been merged before, but this was mostly done by hand, see:
http://tatoeba.org/rus/wall/show_message/4441
http://tatoeba.org/rus/wall/show_message/4488
http://tatoeba.org/rus/wall/show_message/4517

Well semi-automatically, in the way that I didn't change the Tag one by one,
so to answer the first question
Simply report them here, I will use it as my todo list ^^

These are the ones that came to my attention at first glance. Some of them may not be classified as duplication, but I added them anyway for your consideration. If I come across more of them I'll add them later.
>>2nd_Person_Plural/Formal
2nd_Person_Plural_Formal
2nd_Person_Formal_Plural
>>>@needs_native_check
@need_native_check
@needs_native_speaker
>>>tongue twister
English translation of a Japanese tongue twister (maybe "translated tongue twister")
tone twister (is this a typo or is there really something like that?)
>>>idiom
idiome
>>>proverb
proverbe
proverbo
Proverb_(Universal_
saying
Proverbaro_Esperanta
proverb_(in_context_
@proverb
proverbial_phrase
proverb-like
>>>translated_proverb
translated-proverb
foreign_proverb
English_translation_of_a_Japanese_proverb
Indian_proverb
>>>formal
Formal_language
formal_hebrew
formal_sounding
Formal_Hebrew_language
>>>2nd_Person_Informal
2nd_Person_Informal_(Uyghur_
>>>job
profession

i think "proverbaro esperanta" relates to the source of these proverbs; they should be tagged both "proverbaro esperanta" and "proverb".
the same goes for "indian proverb" and "... japanese proverb" (which should be shortened of course); they should get both their tag plus "translated proverb".
In a meta-tag system i would prefer "proverb" to be the most general, having "original" and "translated as sub groups, who on their own have subgroups like the ones mentioned above.

I agree with you on all three points. :))