Is {pu} meant to be inside the abstraction?
No. "cu" won't be needed here once the grammar is fixed, but it's needed as things stand now.
doi xorxes, how is the grammar can be fixed? If we omit {cu} then {pu} would be inside the relative clause.
I meant the grammar of the language, not of this sentence. This sentence is now fine with the current grammar.
Yes, I mean the new grammar you are talking about. how is the new grammar can be better? How it'd work?
The current grammar seems so intuitive to me.
Most people find it more intuitive reading an unterminated tag right in front of a selbri as a selbri tag rather than as a sumti tag of a preceding subordinate bridi.
Most people? One can perceive {pu} after brivla as a tense suffix. Like
{mi jdice-pu} = I decide-d.
In {lo nu da'i zo'e lo jetnu cu djuno pu} this might sound reasonable.
Balizoù
Gwelet an holl valizoùListennoù
Testenn ar frazenn
Lisañs: CC BY 2.0 FRRoll-istor
Ar frazenn-mañ a zo bet ouzhpennet er penn-kentañ evel bezañ un droidigezh eus ar frazenn #1588468
ouzhpennet gant xorxes, 5 Eost 2012
liammet gant xorxes, 5 Eost 2012
aozet gant xorxes, 15 Eost 2012
liammet gant leowalkling, 28 Eost 2014