Your sentence was not added because the following already exists.
superficial --> surface
The meaning does not change.
As it stands, the sentence is possible, but unlikely. "Superficial" has a vaguely pejorative halo. Negating the halo is confusing. "Surface" is entirely neutral and causes no such problems.
At http://www.merriam-webster.com/...y/superficial, see definitions 2a,c and especially the examples: 3 of the 4 illustrate my thesis.
changed, thanks
Of possible interest: I found a blog post with this title: "Liberal vs. Conservative only a Surface Difference?" The reason I was looking is that I should most likely express the idea of this sentence by "On the surface there is no difference between them" or "There is no difference between them on the surface."
I'm saying this because I'm a babbler. The sentence is fine. It was probably fine to begin with.
Etîket
Hemû etîketan bibîneLîste
Sentence text
License: CC BY 2.0 FRTomargeh
We cannot determine yet whether this sentence was initially derived from translation or not.
There is no superficial difference between them.
endamekî nenas tevlî kir, dîrok nayê zanîn
linked by an unknown member, dîrok nayê zanîn
Tamy girêda, di 2012 berfanbarê 16 de
There is no surface difference between them.
Guybrush88 sererast kir, di 2012 berfanbarê 16 de
Guybrush88 girêda, di 2012 berfanbarê 16 de
