Your sentence was not added because the following already exists.
superficial --> surface
The meaning does not change.
As it stands, the sentence is possible, but unlikely. "Superficial" has a vaguely pejorative halo. Negating the halo is confusing. "Surface" is entirely neutral and causes no such problems.
At http://www.merriam-webster.com/...y/superficial, see definitions 2a,c and especially the examples: 3 of the 4 illustrate my thesis.
changed, thanks
Of possible interest: I found a blog post with this title: "Liberal vs. Conservative only a Surface Difference?" The reason I was looking is that I should most likely express the idea of this sentence by "On the surface there is no difference between them" or "There is no difference between them on the surface."
I'm saying this because I'm a babbler. The sentence is fine. It was probably fine to begin with.
태그
모든 태그 보기Sentence text
License: CC BY 2.0 FR활동 이력
We cannot determine yet whether this sentence was initially derived from translation or not.
There is no superficial difference between them.
미확인 회원이 추가, date unknown
미확인 회원이 연결, date unknown
Tamy씨가 연결, 2012년 12월 16일
There is no surface difference between them.
Guybrush88씨가 편집, 2012년 12월 16일
Guybrush88씨가 연결, 2012년 12월 16일
