thanks

same here, both number 2s are the best for me

> I should look for sentences written on a specific license, shouldn't I?

I agree with this, but, with different licenses applied to the same sentence, I have your same question: which one will prevail?

And this is why I find it confusing

"3rd - Can we have the same sentence (duplicates) that belong to different licenses?

I'm Ricardo. (CC-BY-2.0)
I'm Ricardo. (CC0 1.0)"

Generally speaking, duplicates are merged, so in general I think there should be a single license for them, but personally I don't think it would be useful to have multiple licenses for exactly identical sentences. If I were someone who chooses to reuse data from Tatoeba, I would find it very confusing to have completely different licenses for a single sentence, like having two different licenses for a sentence like "I'm Ricardo".

thanks :)

I opened a ticket for this: https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/1606

thanks

I reported this on the bug tracker: https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/1595

you're welcome :)

I reported this on Github: https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/1593

I tried to do the same thing on Firefox, and I couldn't do this either. Thanks for having posted, I thought it was a problem of my computer too

I just opened a ticket on the bug tracker for this: https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/1588

why should it be a better example if it is in the past tense rather than in the present tense?

I changed the Italian sentence to a past tense

thanks

I reported this bug yesterday: https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/1571

nice and interesting graphs, thanks

good job for this

thanks

that's good news, congrats and good work to gillux