Thank you. You're a great moderator.

Das kann ich Dir sagen: es gibt vier verschiedene Leerzeichen, die vor oder nach gewissen anderen Satzzeichen gesetzt werden, und jedes davon hat bei den Autoren Anhänger. 😊

Danke, Yorwba! 😊

Thanks, everyone, for your replies.

> If only one sentence has audio, that one is kept.

This is what I thought, though I wasn't sure.

This would seem to reward any users out there who have the ability to upload audio and who are motivated by numbers to 'capture' existing sentences:

add a corrected version with audio of a sentence that's already in the corpus
= inherit any translations linked to those older, 'original' sentences when they're corrected
= accrue contribution points
= gain a sentence at the expense of someone else (for those with a zero-sum mentality)

It encourages acquisitive behaviour rather than giving help to others to improve their sentences and the quality of the corpus.

I've been on the receiving end of this a few times. It's only because I kicked up a fuss for all to see that the user in question 'generously' released the sentences he'd gained. Over the years I've seen it happen to others, I would say, multiple times: a comment is left on an incorrect sentence, and when it's eventually edited, it then merges with a newer sentence which has audio.

I don't know about anyone else, but it doesn't seem fair to me.

Now, obviously, this can happen entirely unintentionally. But I don't believe that it always does.