menu
Tatoeba
language
Ro'yxatdan o'tish Kirish
language Oʻzbekcha
menu
Tatoeba

chevron_right Ro'yxatdan o'tish

chevron_right Kirish

Jumlalarni ko'rish

chevron_right Tasodifiy bir jumla

chevron_right Til bo'yicha saralab

chevron_right List bo'yicha saralab

chevron_right Teg bo'yicha saralab

chevron_right Audio bo'yicha saralab

Jamoat

chevron_right Devor

chevron_right Barcha qatnashuvchilar listi

chevron_right Qatnashuvchilarning tillari

chevron_right Til sohiblari

search
clear
swap_horiz
search
JimBreen JimBreen 21-mart, 2010 21-mart, 2010, 6:11:23 (UTC) flag Report link Permalink

Traditional and Simplified Chinese

I saw the comment about converting hanzi on-the-fly. Be very cautious about that, as there are many cases where it simply doesn't work. Proper Traditional<->Simplified conversion needs to work at the lexeme level and in some cases needs some context for disambiguation.

Jack Halpern wrote a very good paper about this about 10 years ago:
http://www.cjk.org/cjk/c2c/c2cbasis.htm

PS: how do I make a comment on another posting?

{{vm.hiddenReplies[377] ? 'expand_more' : 'expand_less'}} hide replies show replies
JimBreen JimBreen 21-mart, 2010 21-mart, 2010, 6:40:28 (UTC) flag Report link Permalink

OK, I worked out how to do a follow-on. I'd clicked "reply" but it hadn't worked. Now it does.

sysko sysko 21-mart, 2010 21-mart, 2010, 11:10:11 (UTC) flag Report link Permalink

the traditional to simplified chinese is not made at "character by character" level, but try to decompose the sentence (you can see how the sentence has been segmented by looking to pinyin)
As I've said I'm in conctact with the guy who develop it, so don't hesitate to report any bad segmentations, I will report to him