> Why does it have to be so troublesome, both for us and for admins?

Yeah, I also don't see the advantage. It's not about one or two sentences. In Dutch I can adopt at least a hundred good ones.

"Adopt sentences from deativated accounts". We can adopt them, but they stay red. Is that the idea?

e.g. https://dev.tatoeba.org/epo/sentences/show/3315450

I suppose it's not yet possible to find my sentences that others have marked as wrong, is it?

Confirmed. I just tested it again.

The 3 pics appear only partly on my screen. Can there be any relation?

See: http://www.ipernity.com/gp/paul.../5014/e7840e94

I know that I have to manually refresh to see the rating. But on iPhone you can't rate at all. The 3 icons are not "clickable", they don't turn into green.

Rating doesn't work on mobile devices? At least not on my iPhone.

OK!
+1 for the new feature!

I'm not sure yet. In the "old system" a corpus maintainer after 2 weeks checks if a correction has been made and changes "@change" to "OK". What if the owner corrects it well, or what if the owner with a new mistake makes it even worse?
I see in the dev site that the reviews don't change after a correction. Can the reviewer be noticed somehow that a correction has been made?

Congrats! Gratuliere! Gratulojn!

> But don't you think it would be better if people were able to mark their own sentences as "OK"? It gives an indication that they have double checked it.

No. It clearly doesn't, as Guybrush already said. Proofreading your own sentences is one of the most difficult things. Because people have the feeling that their own contributions are OK, they don't really double check.

Now we are not allowed to "OK" our sentences. I don't see why the new system would be different.

> Keeping people from marking their own sentences would be a good thing, too.

Yes. Yesterday during the tests I marked one of my own sentences as "correct" because I completely forgot that it was my sentence. I unmarked it afterwards, but I would prefer that marking own sentences as "correct" is impossible. Marking them as "unsure" could a good feature though. I guess we all are sometimes unsure about some sentences, even if we are very fluent in that language.

Oops. Sorry!

In the Advanced Search, the option "sentences of natives only" doens't seem to work. I got several not natives (with a scale of 3 e.g.) in my search of Dutch sentences by native speakers.

Walloon is not the French of Belgium, Hakkeb, but a different language. See e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walloon_language. It has it's own ISO-code: wnl

Flemish sentences are listed as Dutch. If in some cases a Dutch sentence is typically North Dutch, then the tag Dutch - Netherlands is added (see https://tatoeba.org/epo/tags/sh..._with_tag/5719 )

If it is typically South Dutch and probably not understood in the North, then the tag Dutch - Belgium is added. See https://tatoeba.org/epo/tags/sh..._with_tag/5718

Ach so, dann wende ich mich in Zukunft vertrauensvoll an dich! Danke!

I see that sentences with audio cannot be changed any more. This may seem logic, but that means that a simple typo (which cannot be heard in the audio file ;-) ) cannot be corrected. A bug?

> First, I'd like to know how you understand these stats. For instance, what do you think these numbers mean?
- http://prntscr.com/717tto

I have no idea. For my language Dutch it shows 1 0 0 0. That is double Dutch to me :P

Ankaŭ mi ne ricevis respondon ... :-(

Right. Strange that I didn't notice it when I looked for it before. But shouldn't we get an error message? I remember that I translated those messages.