menu
sisku
language
zbasu lo jaspu pilno lo jaspu
language Lojban
menu
sisku

chevron_right zbasu lo jaspu

chevron_right pilno lo jaspu

catlu

chevron_right Show random sentence

chevron_right lo vrici ne se po'i lo bangu

chevron_right lo vrici ne se po'i lo liste

chevron_right lo vrici ne se po'i lo tcita

chevron_right lo vrici poi se bacru

cecmu

chevron_right bitmu

chevron_right liste lo ro cmima

chevron_right bangu lo cmima

chevron_right lo tavla be co'a lo ka jbena

search
clear
swap_horiz
search
Demetrius {{ icon }} keyboard_arrow_right

lo tcila be lo jaspu

keyboard_arrow_right

i zgana lo jufra

keyboard_arrow_right

te gerna

keyboard_arrow_right

Reviews

keyboard_arrow_right

lo liste

keyboard_arrow_right

lo se nelci

keyboard_arrow_right

lo pinka

keyboard_arrow_right

lo pinka po lo jufra po la'o zoi.Demetrius.zoi

keyboard_arrow_right

lo se benji be fi lo bitmu

keyboard_arrow_right

lo vreji be lo citri

keyboard_arrow_right

Audio

keyboard_arrow_right

Transcriptions

translate

traduki lo jufra pe la'o zoi.Demetrius.zoi

se benji la'o zoi.Demetrius.zoi lo bitmu (to 442 da toi)

Demetrius Demetrius April 26, 2010 April 26, 2010 at 9:37:13 AM UTC link Permalink

It is called ‘Classical Orthography’, but in fact it is a different language standard. The two forms of Belarusian stemmed from a Soviet language reform that has (arguably) brought Belarusian closer to Russian (on the other hand, academic Belarusian is, arguably, closer to Polish).

Official Belarusian is taught at schools, but those who use Belarusian every day often prefer Classical one. Classical is rather widespread in the Internet. Laws accompanying a new (minor) reform of the official Belarusian in 2007 also have in fact banned the use Classical Belarusian in press.

Apart from merely orthographical differences (сьнег/śnieh vh снег/snieh; робісся/robiśsia vs робішся/robišsia), there are lexical and grammatical ones.

A big problem is the transcription of loanwords. They aren’t simply written differenlty, they are pronounced differently. In Official Belarusian they are (somewhat inconsistently) borrowed from Russian or using similar transcription system, whilst in Classical they are borrowed from West-European languages directly: метр/mietr vs мэтр/metr for meter, опера/opiera vs опэра/opera, сымбаль/symbal vs сімвал/simvał, Атэны/Athens vs Афіны/Afiny.

There are also some grammatical forms acceptable in Classical Belarusian but considered dialectal in official (synthetic future tense: рабіцьму/rabićmu vs. буду рабіць/budu rabić), and different tendencies towards forming some forms (Gen. pl. of мова can be моў or моваў; classical prefers the latter whilst official the former).

There are also some words words considered Russisms/Polonisms in one variant and widespread in the other (працэнт/pracent vs адсотак/adsotak; цячэнне/ciačeńnie vs плынь/plyń).

Automatic conversion is possible, but there is no aviable open-source software to do this. The only one I know is “Litara”, a plugin for MS Word 2000 (http://pravapis.tut.by/), which is closed-source and is unlikely to be ported to new versions of Word because of Microsoft’s new policy (now it’s necessary to obtain permission from MS).

Wikipedia has 2 versions (be and be-x-old).

Demetrius Demetrius April 17, 2010 April 17, 2010 at 11:48:53 AM UTC link Permalink

I feel like adding a bit of Belarusian sentences. Could you please add it?

I’ll add sentences in Official Belarusian, so I suggest marking Belarusian with the current flag of Belarus.

Those who use Classical Belarusian don’t like that flag anyway. :)