Подаци на сајту су под разним Creative Commons лиценцама.Више информација
Ако ти се свиђа овај садржај, размисли о донацији.
Menu
I'm replying to a few things that have been said here: http://tatoeba.org/eng/sentences/show/3410618
> as for the search engine, has anybody ever considered http://lucene.apache.org/solr/ ?
We were using Lucene at some point, but Lucene core, I believe, not Lucene Solr. This is the context in which we switched to Sphinx, if anyone wonders: http://blog.tatoeba.org/2010/04...to-sphinx.html (that was back in April 2010).
Since that day, nobody had nor took the time to experiment another search engine, or to improve our current set up with Sphinx.
> I'm not very sure why such a simple SEO hasn't been implemented yet
Because SEO has been a rather low priority for Tatoeba. We had frequent server issues, the website was constantly unstable and very slow. Under these conditions you don't really want to focus on how to get the attention of new contributors, you want to get things to work properly.
Alors il est peut-être temps de considérer une autre plateforme plus robuste et performante...
I tried looking at this in the morning to see if a small bash script can just generate and insert the necessary html at least in index.ctp but realized quickly that I have no clue how to do this, since the header is in default.ctp that all views use so the current path and the list of interface languages have to be passed in some variable to some element that can be used in default.ctp
anyway here's the relevant tickets so far:
https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/243
https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/393
https://github.com/Tatoeba/tatoeba2/issues/394
We are considering implementing ElasticSearch (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elasticsearch) which is also based on Lucene.