menu
Tatoeba
language
Înregistrare Autentificare
language Română
menu
Tatoeba

chevron_right Înregistrare

chevron_right Autentificare

Navigați

chevron_right Afișați o propoziție aleatorie

chevron_right Navigați după limbă

chevron_right Navigați după liste

chevron_right Navigați după etichete

chevron_right Navigați după conținut audio

Comunitate

chevron_right Perete

chevron_right Listă cu toți membrii

chevron_right Limbi vorbite de membri

chevron_right Vorbitori nativi

search
clear
swap_horiz
search
JimBreen JimBreen 21 martie 2010 21 martie 2010, 06:11:23 UTC flag Report link Link permanent

Traditional and Simplified Chinese

I saw the comment about converting hanzi on-the-fly. Be very cautious about that, as there are many cases where it simply doesn't work. Proper Traditional<->Simplified conversion needs to work at the lexeme level and in some cases needs some context for disambiguation.

Jack Halpern wrote a very good paper about this about 10 years ago:
http://www.cjk.org/cjk/c2c/c2cbasis.htm

PS: how do I make a comment on another posting?

{{vm.hiddenReplies[377] ? 'expand_more' : 'expand_less'}} ascundeți răspunsurile afișați răspunsurile
JimBreen JimBreen 21 martie 2010 21 martie 2010, 06:40:28 UTC flag Report link Link permanent

OK, I worked out how to do a follow-on. I'd clicked "reply" but it hadn't worked. Now it does.

sysko sysko 21 martie 2010 21 martie 2010, 11:10:11 UTC flag Report link Link permanent

the traditional to simplified chinese is not made at "character by character" level, but try to decompose the sentence (you can see how the sentence has been segmented by looking to pinyin)
As I've said I'm in conctact with the guy who develop it, so don't hesitate to report any bad segmentations, I will report to him