* since it seems many people here are at sea

so this is supposed to illustrate my emphasis? How extravagant! Especially since these examples are taken from sentences I wrote AFTER your accusation...
Do you experience difficulties ordering the sequence of facts?
Nevertheless, I don't see how these sentences are more "emphatic" than anything else. They're just to the point and articulate. They attempt at clarity, since it seems many people here seem to at sea, when someone writes without these annoying emoticons. Insisting on a particular element of a phrase through capitalisation is perfectly appropriate.

Independently of the fact that this judgement of yours should not appear on this wall and constitutes a clear case of an ad hominem attack, could you please provide links to my "emphatic expressions", to ground your accusation, please?

And what has your tendency to emphatic expressions anything to do with me? I still don't get this...

Indeed! I share this view.
So, since according to you, and I agree, this feature of our mind is shared by all humanhood, and that this is subsequently meaningless to address, how come you felt the urge to name my name, among all the others?

Really? No more than I do myself, then?

So how exactly do you know what you don't know? (better than the others, and symptomatically ME)

So how exactly do you know - better than the others, and symptomatically ME - what you don't know?
Do you have a particular instrument to measure your own ineptitude?

By the way, blay_paul, I see quite a lot of inconsistency in your policy: You recommend that only natives should translate sentences, - and somehow put me under accusation for reasons I still ignore - but you own 428 Japanese sentences. Are you ALSO a native Japanese by any chance?
Of how many languages are you a NATIVE, exactly?

Anyway, I prefer London, that's where the damages are the highest, along with the lawyers' fees...

If we don't solve the problem here, we'll have to determine which court will have authority. Maybe in Xinjiang, what do you think? I bet Chinese courts are very lenient on slander...

"Good humour"?
What exactly am I proving? That I don't accept being named in public spaces where I have nothing to do? Or slandered in the same public spaces?
Yes, I do very much prove that.
This matter is very straightforward: The wall is a publicly indexed space where only topics related to the functioning of this service and associated community should appear, to the exclusion of the slandering of its members.
Subsequently, I demand unequivocal public apologies and I request sanctions against the members who have used this space to gratuitously slander me, so they will become unable to do it again in the future.
Does that prove you right, now?

And since when Tatoeba's public wall - fully indexed by search engines - has become a space to vilify specific members of its community?
This practice has a name, it is "public lynching".
Do you clearly realise what you and your friends are doing?

So now your 2 accomplices are mute, and you're always at the center of every one of these games, will you explain to me what this is about and how come I was involved in this, here on the public wall of Tatoeba?

Is the schoolyard full or are we expecting more kids to play here? Obama awaits me, so let's finish this game quickly, please.

I think you must have been drinking other spirits along with your water, tonight...
I'll put it on that for now.

"Fan the flames" ?!? I wasn't even participating in this debate and suddenly my pseudo pops up ON THE WALL without a reason and I am the one to "fan the flames" and requested to send messages when you call me a "poor fish" on this very wall ?!
And who are you anyway to speak in the name of "The community"?
Did you just a make a poll to authorise you to insult me in public?
I haven't received the form, although I am also part of this community, whether you like it or not...

I still don't get why my pseudo would be mentioned in there...

I beg your pardon again. I seem to have been mentioned in your debate. Can you please elaborate?

>OK, maybe channelling sacredceltic a little there

Pardon?