
I'm assuming you were trying to make a variation of 1128748, in which case the first "in" shouldn't be there.
If I'm wrong, please tell me, as otherwise this sentence seems to make no sense.
Thanks!

Yeah, typo, fixed.
Tags
View all tagsSentence text
License: CC BY 2.0 FRLogs
This sentence was initially added as a translation of sentence #1128769
added by cntrational, September 25, 2011
linked by cntrational, September 25, 2011
edited by cntrational, September 26, 2011
linked by nadsat, September 27, 2011
linked by Objectivesea, August 25, 2014