Your sentence was not added because the following already exists.
Comma before "and" in a list is now standard in English.
Comma before "and" in a list is now standard in English as an option.
Yes.
It is true that not all have converted. Do we seek to set examples? If the forms I prefer are in decline, which examples should I set?
2010 or 2003? I have found the document here:
http://www.unesco.org/pv_obj_ca...e/00120-EN.pdf
By the way, it should be ‘endangerment’. There is an e too much there. ☺
‘Endangerment’accepted.
There is another report dated 2010:
"Review of Application and Feedback since 2003".
So both years seem OK.
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&...yR08HsspYDOeDw
Tags
View all tagsSentence text
License: CC BY 2.0 FRLogs
This sentence is original and was not derived from translation.
UNESCO’s Language Vitality and Endangerement framework has established in 2010 six degrees of vitality: safe, vulnerable, definitely endangered, severely endangered, critically endangered, extinct.
added by MrShoval, February 22, 2012
UNESCO’s Language Vitality and Endangerement framework has established in 2010 six degrees of vitality: safe, vulnerable, definitely endangered, severely endangered, critically endangered and extinct.
edited by MrShoval, February 22, 2012
UNESCO’s Language Vitality and Endangerment framework has established in 2010 six degrees of vitality: safe, vulnerable, definitely endangered, severely endangered, critically endangered and extinct.
edited by MrShoval, December 12, 2012
