
> Braŭno
La nomo "Braŭno" ne estas objekto de "konas", sed priskribo de "sinjoron".
Plej facile kompreneblas tio, se ni interpretas la frazon tiel:
Ĉu vi konas (la/tiun) sinjoron, kies nomo estas Braŭno?
PMEG rimarkas pri tio:
"Post o-vorto povas aperi rekta priskribo, kiu identigas la aferon.
Normale temas pri la propra nomo de la afero.
Tia identiga priskribo ne havu n-finaĵon [...]"
Fonto: http://bertilow.com/pmeg/gramat...razpartoj.html (legu sub "Identigaj priskriboj")
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# This comment was copied from #1733065 when duplicate sentences were merged.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dankon.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
# This comment was copied from #1733065 when duplicate sentences were merged.
# --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Duplicates of this sentence have been deleted:
x #1733065
Tags
View all tagsSentence text
License: CC BY 2.0 FRLogs
This sentence was initially added as a translation of sentence #1107758
added by soweli_Elepanto, July 28, 2012
linked by soweli_Elepanto, July 28, 2012
edited by soweli_Elepanto, July 28, 2012
linked by PaulP, May 8, 2016
linked by PaulP, May 8, 2016
linked by PaulP, May 8, 2016
linked by Horus, May 22, 2016
linked by marafon, January 30, 2025
linked by marafon, January 30, 2025
linked by marafon, January 30, 2025