Onze gegevens zijn uitgebracht onder verschillende licenties van Creative Commons.Meer informatie
Als je van deze webstek houdt, denk dan aan een gift.
Muur (7.275 onderwerpen)
Tips
Zorg dat je eerst de Meest gestelde vragen (FAQ) gelezen hebt voordat je een vraag stelt.
We streven ernaar om een vriendelijke sfeer te bewaren voor beschaafde discussies. Gelieve onze regels inzake slecht gedrag te lezen.
LeviHighway
9 uur geleden
frpzzd
10 uur geleden
sharptoothed
12 uur geleden
LeviHighway
12 uur geleden
cafoc64474
19 uur geleden
lingomaxim
23 uur geleden
frpzzd
23 uur geleden
LeviHighway
gisteren
alt
2 dagen geleden
frpzzd
2 dagen geleden
De inhoud van dit bericht is in strijd met onze regels en is daarom onzichtbaar gemaakt. Hij is alleen zichtbaar voor beheerders en de auteur van dit bericht.
De inhoud van dit bericht is in strijd met onze regels en is daarom onzichtbaar gemaakt. Hij is alleen zichtbaar voor beheerders en de auteur van dit bericht.
De inhoud van dit bericht is in strijd met onze regels en is daarom onzichtbaar gemaakt. Hij is alleen zichtbaar voor beheerders en de auteur van dit bericht.
I feel quite frustrated when translating English into Chinese. There are many English sentences use "it," "he/she," or "this/that." This is frustrating because even tho if I can translate them into 它, 他, 她, 這個, 那個, but they all sound very unnatural. For example "it is there" is translated into "它在那," but we rarely use 它 that way. We almost always specify the thing. Also, there're sentences that use "he" and "she" together, like "he loves her." It is translated into "他愛她" but you would never hear this sentence in real life, because 他 and 她 have the same pronunciation. It would sound like "ta lives ta," which is very confusing. Also "this/that happens" is translated into "這/那會發生" or "這/那件事會發生," which are still understandable, but you'll never say them in real life. I can't think a good solution for those situations.
An addition: "do", Chinese much less commonly use a generalized verb like English "to do".
Just curious, regarding the ta/ta situation, is it any different in writing (i.e. would it be just as unnatural to read that sentence in a book)?
How do you generally refer to multiple different people of different genders in context - would you generally refer to them by name each time? For instance, something like:
"I don't think Tom should marry Mary."
- "But he loves her!"
If an analogous interaction were taking place in Chinese, would the second sentence just repeat their names? Or maybe use a pronoun for one of them while repeating the other's name?
It feels weird to me. Because when I read a sentence, there's a voice in my head. So "ta loves ta" would look weird, because I'm trying to read out the sentence.
Without knowing Chinese, some possibilities, in no particular order:
1. Leave the difficult sentences untranslated. Maybe you have a better idea when you meet them in the future, and there is no lack of English sentences to translate, not to speak of other languages.
2. Look at other translations of the sentence for inspiration. (But be careful to add any translation to the sentence it is a translation of.)
3. Consider a context for the original sentence, and then consider how you would or could translate the entire context, and then check if that creates a valid translation for the sentence in question.
4. To translate "He loves her." into Finnish, I have to do some maneuver like "he" -> "man/boy" or "she" -> "woman/girl", as "he" and "she" both translate to "hän", and "Hän rakastaa häntä." is a somewhat strange construction. I do consider these various variations with man, boy, girl or woman to be acceptable translations.
5. English has constructions like "There is a car in the garage.", where the "there is" part has no equivalent in Finnish, so this would simply become "Autotallissa on auto.". The structure of the sentence is different, but the meaning is the same. A valid translation.
I don’t think every sentence is meant to be translated in every language; just don’t translate a sentence if it feels too weird. You can add your own sentences that reflect a broader and more typical use of Chinese, and let other members translate your sentences.
+1
✹✹ Stats & Graphs ✹✹
Tatoeba Stats, Graphs & Charts have been updated:
https://tatoeba.j-langtools.com/allstats/
If a user is completely inactive (though doesn't have a closed account), hasn't added anything in 8 years, never reacted to any comments about corrections since then, and nearly all of his sentences lack punctuation, is it okay for me to write one message to e.g. his last sentence and then proceed to correct all of his sentences (over 60) instead of writing a comment on each of them and choosing the @change punctuation tag?
I don't know if it's OK, but I do the same thing ;-)
Me too!
Eu não sei se isto está certo, mas eu faço a mesma coisa.
I don't have a problem with that.
Gostamos muito de saber falar em outros idiomas.
Could I add pun jokes and could I translate them?
I don't think anyone has ever objected to puns here. There's a pun tag with some 250 sentences so marked. It would be interesting to learn some Chinese puns, which must be numerous given its logographic writing.
👍
Can I translate them? If I translate by the literal meaning, the pun would be gone.
Literal translations of sayings are not uncommon, though they are best accompanied by an idiomatic translation as well to highlight the difference, but in case of a pun which may not have a similar punny translation, I guess a literal one would suffice, perhaps with a comment to explain what the original pun was like/about.
De inhoud van dit bericht is in strijd met onze regels en is daarom onzichtbaar gemaakt. Hij is alleen zichtbaar voor beheerders en de auteur van dit bericht.
De inhoud van dit bericht is in strijd met onze regels en is daarom onzichtbaar gemaakt. Hij is alleen zichtbaar voor beheerders en de auteur van dit bericht.